To investors, OpenAI announced GPT-4o yesterday. The demos were incredible, including real-time language translation, a clean verbal interface where users can speak to the model, the model’s use of photo and video inputs, and the ability for AI bots to speak with each other to accomplish tasks.
Watching those two phones talk, I think of the movie, "Her". They're getting closer. It's probably hear, but I don't realize it, but I look forward to the day when I get up in the morning and while feeding the dogs and making breakfast, my AI on my phone gives me a 3 minute update on everything I need to start the day: weather, headlines (with my preferences built in), my appointments for the day, news of interest.
One thing I thought about is lawsuits. These bots make mistakes rn as is, and some of these mistakes could be extremely problematic even if they occur a minority of the time. It will take 3-5 years or more to polish this enough to a point of mass usability
'Customers are going to save more time and headache in the future.'
I can think of 3.1 million peeps who will not be customers. At some point productivity enhancement necessitates a nihilistic response i.e. human attrition.
We've built a venture fund around this idea and are working currently on leading an investment into the PayPal of AI commerce. Shoot me a DM if interested in taking a look.
Watching those two phones talk, I think of the movie, "Her". They're getting closer. It's probably hear, but I don't realize it, but I look forward to the day when I get up in the morning and while feeding the dogs and making breakfast, my AI on my phone gives me a 3 minute update on everything I need to start the day: weather, headlines (with my preferences built in), my appointments for the day, news of interest.
*here not hear.
Thank you for your feedback,for more information on how to be successful ,WH'AT'S'AP'P ME 十
+•1•765=2•0=8•=3=••9=••5=••7=•√•✔️✔️✔️✔***
Thank you for your feedback,for more information on how to be successful ,WH'AT'S'AP'P ME 十
+•1•765=2•0=8•=3=••9=••5=••7=•√•✔️✔️✔️✔***
The question is not how to tax things but why should taxes be applied to transactions between individuals. There is no ethical justification for this
Thank you for your feedback,for more information on how to be successful ,WH'AT'S'AP'P ME 十
+•1•765=2•0=8•=3=••9=••5=••7=•√•✔️✔️✔️✔***
One thing I thought about is lawsuits. These bots make mistakes rn as is, and some of these mistakes could be extremely problematic even if they occur a minority of the time. It will take 3-5 years or more to polish this enough to a point of mass usability
Thank you for your feedback,for more information on how to be successful ,WH'AT'S'AP'P ME 十
+•1•765=2•0=8•=3=••9=••5=••7=•√•✔️✔️✔️✔***
'Customers are going to save more time and headache in the future.'
I can think of 3.1 million peeps who will not be customers. At some point productivity enhancement necessitates a nihilistic response i.e. human attrition.
Thank you for your feedback,for more information on how to be successful ,WH'AT'S'AP'P ME 十
+•1•765=2•0=8•=3=••9=••5=••7=•√•✔️✔️✔️✔***
Agree with you 100%. https://www.genventures.xyz/research/machine-economy-thesis-update-2024
We've built a venture fund around this idea and are working currently on leading an investment into the PayPal of AI commerce. Shoot me a DM if interested in taking a look.
Thank you for your feedback,for more information on how to be successful ,WH'AT'S'AP'P ME 十
+•1•765=2•0=8•=3=••9=••5=••7=•√•✔️✔️✔️✔***