It is not Bessent vs Druckenmiller….it is Bessent AND Druckenmiller.

Today’s Letter is brought to you by GalaxyOne!

A lot of people have their money working for them. The real question is how hard. That’s what GalaxyOne is built around.

If you make over $200K a year or over $300K a year combined, you probably qualify as an accredited investor. Galaxy Premium Yield pays 8.00% on cash, guaranteed by Galaxy Digital. Everyone on GalaxyOne earns 3.50% APY on GalaxyOne Cash, and FDIC-insured checking account power by Cross River bank.¹

The best part is you can set that interest to auto-invest straight into your favorite stock, ETF, or crypto.² You don’t have to think about it every month.

Right now GalaxyOne is running a crazy promo — a $3,000 cash bonus when you deposit $10,000 or more in cash or crypto.

---

To investors,

Scott Bessent is one of the best macro traders in the world. It has been well documented that he got an elite investing education while working under George Soros, but there is another investor who may be slightly more famous and widely recognized as the best Soros protege: Stanley Druckenmiller.

Debating which one of these guys is better is like trying to pick between a Ferrari and Lamborghini. The exercise is futile and your answer probably relies more on personal preference than an objective difference.

The shared lineage of these two men is what makes the recent debate around the US Treasury’s announcement to “at least double, the size of liquidity support buyback operations for longer-dated nominal coupon securities.”

Bessent obviously believes that he can manipulate long-term yields lower by engaging in this activity. He was proven correct initially after the announcement, but long-term yields have already rebounded back to the same level amid concerns around the national debt and continued money printing.

It remains to be seen whether the Treasury has enough firepower to have a lasting effect, even if they continue signaling their $1 trillion general account is available if needed.

On the other side of the debate is Stanley Druckenmiller. He published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal yesterday titled “Let the Bond Market Speak.” The subtitle reads “Rising interest rates are a signal of trouble ahead. Artificially suppressing it heightens the danger.”

Those words don’t exactly leave much for interpretation. Druckenmiller is explicitly disagreeing with Bessent and the Treasury in public. I would normally expect a disagreement to be handled through a private phone call, but a public dissent like this probably means Druckenmiller feels public pressure is the only way to reverse course.

In the op-ed, he concludes that the long-dated bond yields bouncing back to the same levels post-announcement from the Treasury can only mean one thing: “The market’s verdict was swift and correct: This wasn’t liquidity management, it was price management—and a mistake far larger than $4 billion suggests.”

I personally thought Druckenmiller’s argument about price discovery was the most important part of the op-ed. It reads:

“I have spent five decades trading on a simple premise: Markets aggregate information no committee possesses, and prices are how that information reaches decision makers. The long-term Treasury yield is the most important price in the world. It is also the only fiscal disciplinarian the U.S. has left. Neither party will run on entitlement reform. Both have spent the past decade expanding commitments while ignoring arithmetic. Democracies don’t repair their finances because a budget office publishes a table. They repair them only when the cost of inaction becomes visible and immediate, when mortgage rates bite, when auctions tail, when the political price of a rising long bond finally exceeds the political price of touching spending.

Every basis point of artificial yield suppression is a subsidy to procrastination. Suppressed long rates sugarcoat the interest-cost projections, shrink the apparent urgency, and let incumbents assure voters the debt is someone else’s problem. If Congress and the administration are unlikely to touch entitlements even with the market’s signal, they are certain not to touch them without one. Whatever this operation saves in basis points, it will cost multiples in delay.”

This all seems fairly logical, right? I agree.

But if Druckenmiller is right, which I believe he is, then it would require us to believe that Scott Bessent is completely missing the obvious data. I find that very, very hard to believe. He is too smart and too experienced to make such a rookie mistake.

This left me confused until I realized an important aspect of Druckenmiller’s op-ed. The entire thing was written by AI. Yes, you read that right. The AI measurement tools online say 100% of the op-ed is written by AI.

The reason this is important is because it tells me that Druckenmiller was not overly passionate about this situation and probably put it together rather quickly. AI is very good at doing that for someone. So why would Druckenmiller put together an op-ed quickly, especially one that critiqued his friend and former colleague in one of the most popular financial newspapers in the world?

Well…what if Bessent asked him to do it? What if the situation everyone thinks is Bessent vs Druckenmiller is actually Besssent AND Druckenmiller.

Under this perspective, Bessent would understand that the Trump administration is trying to print too much money. He knows the damage that is being done. But he also wants to keep his job. So Bessent has to do the things necessary to appease his boss, while still wanting politicians in DC to understand the signal being provided by long-dated yields.

So what do you do in that scenario?

You announce the intention to double your purchases and spend billions of dollars. And then you have your homie write an op-ed saying the government should be doing the opposite and people need to stop manipulating the market.

This is chess, not checkers.

While the media will run with the narrative that Bessent and Druckenmiller fundamentally disagree on the path forward, I just don’t believe that. They both have previously spoke publicly about the need for the government to become more disciplined. They come from the same school of thought. They both are incredible macro traders. And there is no chance that Druckenmiller surprise attacked Bessent in public like that.

So sit back and watch the show. The financial geniuses are using every tool in their toolbox, including manipulation of the mainstream media, to address the dismal financial position the US finds itself in.

The bad boys of finance just played their hand masterfully. And they did it together.

Hope you have a great day. I will talk to everyone next time.

- Anthony J. Pompliano

Founder & CEO, ProCap Financial (Nasdaq: BRR)

---

Can Bitcoin Protect You From AI Threats?

Dr. Roman Yampolskiy is a professor of computer science at the University of Louisville and one of the world's leading AI safety researchers, credited with coining the term "AI safety" over a decade ago.

In this conversation, we break down why he believes superintelligence may be fundamentally uncontrollable, and the recent incidents of AI models hacking, lying, and blackmailing their way out of containment. We also get into the surprising relationship between AI and bitcoin, the collapse of trust from deepfakes, and what happens to jobs and society once we cross the AGI threshold.

---

Podcast Sponsors

1. Figure – Get a slice of $160,000 with their Community Appreciation event. T&Cs apply. True DeFi Democratized Prime yielding ~8.5% APY. They also have the lowest industry interest rates at 8.91% with 12 month terms! Take out a Crypto Backed Loan today. Figure Lending LLC dba Figure (NMLS 1717824)

2. Arch Public’s platform automates your trading strategy beyond DCA for equities, commodities, ETFs, and crypto. With advanced inputs that reflect your own intentions, Arch Public supports smarter entries, exits, and opportunities in volatile markets. Connect with their team, try the product for free, and see how agentic trading can work for you, with Arch Public!

3. Lava - Lava allows you to earn up to 5% back in bitcoin every time you spend with Lava Card, borrow against your bitcoin at the lowest rates, earn yield on cash, and move money globally. Get started in just a few minutes at lava.xyz/pomp!

4. GalaxyOne – Open an account with promo code POMP and deposit $10,000 to earn a $3,000 bonus. Terms apply. https://go.galaxy.app/HMiq/p57n69yy

5. Simple Mining offers a premium white-glove Bitcoin mining service. Want to grow your Bitcoin stack? Visit https://www.simplemining.io/pomp

6. Uphold - Uphold is the all-in-one platform to trade, earn, stake, and swap across 300+ assets with real-time proof-of-reserves and any-to-any conversions. Manage your entire crypto portfolio in one place at www.uphold.com

7. BloFin - BloFin is a fast-growing cryptocurrency exchange focused on providing professional-grade trading tools, deep liquidity, and a secure trading environment for crypto traders worldwide.

---

🚨READER NOTE: If you want to sponsor The Pomp Letter, you can fill out this form and someone from our team will get in touch with you.

---

You are receiving The Pomp Letter because you either signed up or you attended one of the events that I spoke at. Feel free to unsubscribe if you aren’t finding this valuable. Nothing in this email is intended to serve as financial advice. Do your own research.

1. GalaxyOne is a financial technology platform, not a bank. Galaxy Premium Yield is an investment note issued by Galaxy Digital LP and guaranteed by Galaxy Digital Holdings LP — it is an investment product, not a bank deposit, is unsecured, and is not FDIC or SIPC insured. Available to U.S. accredited investors only. Cash deposits held at Cross River Bank, Member FDIC, insured up to $250,000. Annual Percentage Yield is variable and subject to change.

2. Securities products are not FDIC insured, not bank guaranteed, and may lose value. GalaxyOne Crypto is not FDIC or SIPC insured.