Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AB's avatar

Finally had time to do this math problem:

Miners:

For this randomly decided to use 16 ASIC miners, Model: Bitmain antminer S19 Pro which would get us around 110 TH/s, around 3250 Watts needed per miner. So that is around 52,000Wper day.

- Assuming we will use starlink to connect to our mining pools and etc, plus other things to make the satellite stay in space and not become a fancy fireworks, lets set aside 1000W for all of that

Total W needed: 53K W

Power:

According to NASA, the average solar irradiance in space aka solar constant is around 11,360 W/m²

High grade space solar panels has about 30% efficiency

Effective Power Generation per m²: 1,360 W/m² × 30% = 408 W/m²

Calculating our total area needed to power our rigs: 53,000 W ÷ 408 W/m² ≈ 129.9 m²

On average solar panel mass is 1kg per m²

Calculating our mass for solar panel: 129.9 m² × 1 kg/m² = 129.9 kg

Satellite Mass Estimation

ASIC MINER: 13.2 KG per miner X 16 miners =129.9 kg

Solar Panels Mass: 129.9 kg

Estimated mass for other structures, thermal management and power regulation, Starlink comms: 600 kg ( very rough estimate, which is close to SpaceX Starlink satellites )

129.9 kg + 129.9 kg + 600 kg = 941 kg

Launch Cost

SpaceX Rideshare program

Cost per kg: estimated $5,000/KG

Total Launch cost 941 kg satellite at $5,000/kg is $4,705,000

BTC Mined per Day (used chatgpt for this part)

Hash rate: 16 miners × 110 TH/s = 1.76 PH/s = 1,760 TH/s

Network Metrics (based on real-time data):

Network Hashrate: 836.81 EH/s (836,810,000 TH/s)

Block Reward: 3.125 BTC

Blocks per Day: 144

More math. Shared network hashrate calc

1,760TH / 836,810,000 TH/s = 0.000002103(0.0002103%)

Daily BTC Mined per day

450BTC/day×0.000002103=0.00094635BTC/day

now w/pool fees assuming its at 2%

0.00094635BTC/day×(1−0.02)=0.00092742BTC/day

With BTC at 100K

0.00092742BTC/day×100,000$/BTC= $92.742/day

Rough estimate cost of $4.7 mill, without labor and miners bought. Or solar panel.

Profit per day $92.7 which is around 34k a year profit.

Other factors to consider: thermal management, structural integrity, data transmission, gov regulations and maintenance

What if instead if sending our own satellite, what if we just attached miners to the ISS or something, help NASA do NASA things since space is cool.

Anyways follow me ya nerds

https://x.com/ABwasabi

Reference:

https://www.coinwarz.com/mining/bitcoin/calculator

https://www.spacex.com/rideshare/

https://www.solar.com/learn/space-based-solar-vs-conventional-solar-how-are-they-different/#:~:text=The%20silicon%20cells%20that%20are,in%20the%20International%20Space%20Station.

https://www.kompulsa.com/bitcoin-miner-power-consumption-much-energy-bitcoin-miners-consume/#:~:text=Antminer%20S19%20Power%20Consumption%20%E2%80%93%20Energy,Terahash%20at%20the%20same%20temperature.

https://www.alternative-energy-tutorials.com/solar-power/solar-irradiance.html#:~:text=According%20to%20NASA%2C%20the%20average,(that%20is%201.37%20kilowatts).

Expand full comment
Doug G's avatar

The idea is interesting. As someone else mentioned, heat dissipation will be a major issue. Mining generates a lot of heat, and with no atmosphere, you can’t rely on convection to provide cooling as you would on Earth. I wonder if the moon might be a viable option—you could use the moon as a giant heatsink. But your rig would only be active 50% of the time unless you also provide batteries to keep it running in darkness.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts